Crafting

[cole45]

Multiple craftman could be cool. we like people working together yah?

"I'll get the hilt, you make sure the tang fits."

[dier_cire]

Let's extrapolate the sleeping and crafting. If you can craft (use a skill) while sleeping, then logic would dictate that I could swing for damage while sleeping.

Heck why stop there I might as well cast spells, heal, do research, interrogate and handle allegiances.

I mean it only makes sense.

You can swing damage in your sleep, if you are holding a weapon and calling it. If you weren't taking damage from a sleepwalker, I'd say you'd be cheating.
You could also try to cast a spell, interogate, or a healing skill in your sleep, however, it'd be treated as if you were disrupted since it specifically says so in the rules.
Research and allegience stuff is in between events

So far I see nothing invalid with what you said.

[Peace420]

*Kicks Ried in the junk*

And Aaron you know as well as I do that there are definitely ways to make those kinds of items IG so that doesn't fly.

[GM-Mike]

For the record, if this thread goes on for ten pages, I'm going to shoot somebody.

[dier_cire]

Long as it's not Aaron or I, since we need to take over the game first.

And is it my fault for charged and timed based skill disruption being overly thorough? Now if we said you could start and stop, could you smith in your sleep, since you could be infinitely starting and stopping the skill? Taking that stopping requires zero time, and time does need to increase somehow (otherwise how would you eaplain 4-8 hours of time passing), miniscule amounts of time would be eaten up by starting.

Of course, you could always use the cheap out of infinity * 0 = 0.

[Peace420]

For the record, if this thread goes on for ten pages, I'm going to shoot somebody.

That sounded like a challenge.

[Zydana]

I vote for a poll to see who gets shot when we get there.

[Adam]

So is the person who makes it go to 10 pages the one that gets shot or is it random for whoever posted to help get it there...





...whoops!

[dier_cire]

So is the person who makes it go to 10 pages the one that gets shot or is it random for whoever posted to help get it there...

I don't know but I think we should discuss it in further detail. I think the number of posts contributed should be a factor. I also think onlne users at the time of the post should be factored into it as well since those that post at night have less opportunity to post since less people post after them while they are awake.

Perhaps it could be based on amount of time logged in?

[Adam]

Or just one chance per post.

[dier_cire]

Can we have hidden chances? I don't want everyone else to know what my actual chances are.

And I think my chances and someone else's chances should be called different names. It doesn't matter if they all end up in the same pool, I want mine to be called 'tofu' because a common name means I can't think of them differently.

[Adam]

You could PM Mike secretly, mentioning this post to get secret chances.





(P.S. DO NOT REALLY DO THIS. IT IS A JOKE)

[Smitty19]

Now this is just tom-foolery to get it up to 10 pages......









I like it!

[Aurora]

If Mike doesn't shoot someone I'm seriously going to deny baked goods especailly when there is just babble going on.

[dier_cire]

Babble? Would you rather have Mike just aribitrarily pick someone? I mean if I post twice as much as you shouldn't I have twice as many chances (not including my hidden chances).

I also think we need some in-forum bonuses to encourage more postings. I mean we can't just post based on mechanics alone. Those that don't care about the mechanics of being shot need to have a reason to post too.

We also need to ensure that 5-7 low volume posters will always equal or have a greater chance than a high volume poster. Otherwise it's not fair.

and have we de-railed this thread yet?