**racial disciplines** I will not be reviewing them as I don't agree with the premise. people should play a race because they want to, not for mechanical benefits. I understand the reasons, but I disagree with and oppose it. moving from racial boons to essence boons was a step forward. introducing ...

I know the number of paths played if not the precise characters because its often thrown in my face as a counter to my points about warriors sucking. Not sure what thats supposed to mean, but even if every Pc currently played was a rogue, that would not mean that is some player preference. A player...

if you can land packets, your going to win, if you cannot, your going to loose. Mmmmmaybe, unless your an empath that channels through a weapon instead of packets. Yes that has been allowed, and removes dodge as an issue. that is why people prefer rogue. They dont, you do. stop sating that. however...

*looks for my whip to crack it*

disarm is a very rarely used skill, The fact you think its rarely used is because you play runners/fighters and not warriors...i see it most every event, and more than once an event. and I always build characters to have some form of damage that can NEVER be taken away or stopped, such as fists, th...

I would even do the face off in a wide open field. As long as the warrior can SEE the rogue, the rogue does not stand a chance, assuming equal player fighting skills. the defensive skills a warrior gets over sage are useless to *ME* I think the reason I hate warrior so much is because so many of the...

I have hired a group of cult de programmers to help you get the flawed DPS argument, you keep using to indicate what path is cooler than another, out of your brain. Its doesnt woprk in a LARP, and barely workes in MMPOGs. They will be kidnapping you shortly. because of this people prefer the better ...

It's not a question of trying to rationalize a difference between logically identical procedures, it's noting the specific method of destruction as outlined in the rules, and it's completely logical. There is no specific method even mentioned in the skill mechanic description, just the name of the ...

http://metrodetroitgamers.files.wordpre ... er-pdf.pdf

http://michicon.webs.com/

Was there ever a flyer.pdf created that I can get emailed or get directed to in order to post/hand out/or table drop at the convention?

While I get that "shatter" is a mechanic, I would agree that shatter is JUST a specialised form of destruction argument IF the "shatter" description didnt have these lines in it: These attacks destroy weapons, armor and shields. If the weapon or shield is hit with the “Shatter” c...

ok...i have my "no" answer as I expected. However, saing the lo0ng answer is because its destroyed instead of shattered just doesnt make sense. Its semantics as they mean the same thing in essence. Its like saying melting wax and liquifying wax are different because the words describing th...

ollie I think those only prevent destruction from the "Shatter" call itself. Thats the answer I am expecting from the GMs, but wanted to get them to clarify. Ark I was going to reply, but given our history im sure we would have an epic argument over it that would end up not related to the...

Why does it say " you sense/spot robust unpleasantness" when I click either..... I think I am being segrated and targeted again...

Who the heck let the Valk with the Jason mask in here?!?!?!

*As my rumbling dwarven appetite, frenzied by the lure of a feast and a free one at that, wages a the tug of war with the sand-in-your-britches-Esq itch at the back of my neck due to the light fog of "wrongness" struggle for control; my eyes ride over food, then people, then water(or ale a...