Search found 914 matches
- Fri Sep 19, 2003 9:37 am
- Forum: Page Updates and Website Suggestion Box
- Topic: Rules Update
- Replies: 9
- Views: 14433
- Fri Sep 19, 2003 9:31 am
- Forum: Out Of Game Archive
- Topic: VOTE NOW!
- Replies: 43
- Views: 35411
- Thu Sep 18, 2003 3:07 pm
- Forum: Random Junk
- Topic: Avatar and sig test
- Replies: 26
- Views: 19960
- Thu Sep 18, 2003 10:43 am
- Forum: Out Of Game Archive
- Topic: VOTE NOW!
- Replies: 43
- Views: 35411
Certain people may be able to reach the guy in the tower, and is he not casting in the tower in secrecy? If he's on the parapet outside then he can be shot but if he is inside how does anyone know he is casting ? Wouldn't that be the same as what Eric was talking about? The whole idea of counterspel...
- Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:03 pm
- Forum: Out Of Game Archive
- Topic: VOTE NOW!
- Replies: 43
- Views: 35411
- Wed Sep 17, 2003 2:57 pm
- Forum: Out Of Game Archive
- Topic: VOTE NOW!
- Replies: 43
- Views: 35411
- Wed Sep 17, 2003 2:47 pm
- Forum: Out Of Game Archive
- Topic: VOTE NOW!
- Replies: 43
- Views: 35411
My vote would be for neither, I like the protection from BLAH idea. The problem that I see with all of the options is that because we don't have standardized incants every time an arcane tries to counter another arcane they would have to call a game stop and ask the arcane what they are casting. The...
- Mon Sep 15, 2003 4:29 pm
- Forum: Rule Forum Archives
- Topic: Proposed rule changes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16897
Can you do both on a single piece of armour? How do you decide armour catagory if you mix and match? That's why I proposed having all arms and legs be 1 and varying the chest piece value, base the armor category on the breastplate and the rest doesn't affect the category. That would also eliminate ...
- Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:51 pm
- Forum: Rule Forum Archives
- Topic: Proposed rule changes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16897
- Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:01 am
- Forum: Rule Forum Archives
- Topic: Proposed rule changes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16897
I still very much dislike the armor system suggested above, it ends up reducing the lt and med alot and barely affects the heavy at all. I still think 54 possible pts of armor is way too much but that's just my opinion. Last event the #s that the NPC monsters were calling was pretty high and the onl...
- Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:49 am
- Forum: Rule Forum Archives
- Topic: Proposed rule changes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16897
Obviously the average warrior has no restrictions so he gets no bonus. Of course, he already has the 75% extra armor too... The warrior could then pick up a discipline that has armor resrictions, or buy rogue skills. Full path warrior would have lots of armor and only have to wear med, and get to c...
- Fri Sep 12, 2003 11:50 am
- Forum: Rule Forum Archives
- Topic: Proposed rule changes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16897
Quqlity weapons Proposal 1 seems more intuitive and it doesn't chode out the Rogue like proposal 2 does (why backstab for 3 or 6 if you can deliver 5 from anywhere every 10 seconds). The only thing is that a quality weapon then does nothing for a Sage or a Healer. Armor Ouch! the percentage decease ...
- Fri Sep 12, 2003 9:09 am
- Forum: Random Junk
- Topic: Avatar and sig test
- Replies: 26
- Views: 19960
- Thu Sep 11, 2003 11:10 am
- Forum: Random Junk
- Topic: Avatar and sig test
- Replies: 26
- Views: 19960
Avatar and sig test
Working?