The armor change was to simplify the armor healing rules which right now I think are complicated thats all. See I dont see any issue with bleeding out except if you are RP'ing. Right now the rules try to stop people from keeping track of time and RP'ing at the same time except in two situations. One...

We need upkeep to have an economy. Basically there needs to be taxes and such or there is no real (true) economy. on a side note Right now we have lots of metal and not much leatherarmor even though I have to believe that hide is in abundance. Personally I dont think metal is scarce enough in the sy...

Well Here I am at the larp page and I saw an idea I kinda liked and wanted your thoughts. This idea is just an idea not a specific rule implimentation. "I don't propose any sort of "bleeding out" mechanism, because I don't believe timed effects are larpable, and I don't think gradual ...

I have not responded yet because well I am on the fense. I dont nessesarily like the idea of rewarding heraldry but at the same time I completely understand the positive reinforcement

-Chris

Thieves guild did not get caught. The mark of the secret societies were never shown for others to see. Forexample they had a mark on the upper shoulder. Personally if I was in any society, especially a secret one, I would have some kind of mark so dont have some idiot walk in and claim to be part of...

Yep exactly as Doug says it fits the arch type. Even the illuminatti has a means of identification. Without identification then anyone from anywhere could claim to be part of your house. Babylon 5 had a thieves guild who tatoo'd with a scar. Not sure if the scars were the same or just all unusually ...

Heraldry does not need to be displayed. it could be a tatoo on the arm that no one but those in the organization would see. I mean wouldnt it be cool if 3 years from now FH had 4 chapters with over 500 members. People can travel to different larps and you would not nessesarily know a person in your ...

Problem with verbal identification is you have to do it every time a new PC enters the area.

-Chris

LOL

-chris

I hear you but to be honest I would rather have the costuming though it is tough to do.

-Chris

I am saying that if everyone would like to play multiple characters then yes you could create a character to kill multiple people and switch. Now I have VERY stong feelings in regard to evil players. franklly I like them, and I canno understand why players hate players who screw with other players v...

Actually with this change then all frontal damage up to 2 damage would be ignored so yes a weapon focused warrior can ignore all frontal attacks from anyone except another weapon focused warrior. Not sure if I like this and this is why. As it stands now a non weapon focus warrior has a choice he can...

Nope if a character is not in game then they are not in-game thus they will not be able to be found.

I will never again have a situation where "I am out of game here but my PC is here invisable so I would have done xyz."


Nope not again

-Chris

I dont care if I get it via e-mail or by mail between events. Dont get me wrong we too need to have better policies in place for those who come in late or leave early. On a side note this is the first event we ever got hardcore about votes. We wont screw anyone over until we have some solid policies...

I am not against the idea of a person's influince go wher they last assigned it BUT I have great fears that if we do it that way people will become complacent and not mix it up. It would be as if I voted republican and because I am simply lazy I never go back to vote even though I want democrat. -Ch...